The growth of the cabinet system in parliamentary democracies, including India, has led to a significant shift in the dynamics of power, often resulting in the marginalization of parliamentary supremacy.
- Concentration of Power: The cabinet, composed of the Prime Minister and key ministers, wields substantial executive power. Decisions are often made within this small group, reducing the role of the broader parliament in the legislative process.
- Party Discipline: Strong party loyalty and discipline mean that Members of Parliament (MPs) frequently vote along party lines, limiting independent decision-making. This can lead to situations where parliamentary debates and discussions are overshadowed by the cabinet’s directives.
- Limited Legislative Scrutiny: The increasing reliance on ordinances and executive orders can bypass extensive parliamentary scrutiny, diminishing the legislative body’s oversight function.
- Dependency on Majority: The government’s stability often relies on maintaining a majority in the House, which can further diminish parliamentary checks and balances.
In essence, while the cabinet system facilitates efficient governance, it can undermine the essential principles of parliamentary supremacy by concentrating power and limiting legislative engagement.
