‘Communalism arises either due to power struggle or relative deprivation.’ Argue by giving suitable illustrations.

Communalism and Its Causes: Power Struggle vs. Relative Deprivation

Introduction

Communalism refers to politicization of religious identities, often leading to conflicts between different communities. It is fueled by competition for power and socio-economic disparities rather than mere religious differences.


1. Communalism as a Power Struggle

  • Political Mobilization on Religious Lines
    • Political parties use religious identities to consolidate votes.
    • Example: Partition of India (1947) – Communal tensions escalated due to British divide-and-rule policies and elite political rivalry (Muslim League vs. Congress).
  • Majoritarianism vs. Minority Identity Assertion
    • Majority communities may assert dominance, leading to reactionary mobilization by minorities.
    • Example: Hindutva vs. Minority Politics – Riots in Gujarat (2002) and anti-Sikh riots (1984) linked to political patronage.
  • Communal Violence for Electoral Gains
    • Politicians often engineer communal riots for electoral benefits (Paul Brass’s “Institutionalized Riot System” theory).
    • Example: Muzaffarnagar Riots (2013) before Uttar Pradesh elections.

2. Communalism Due to Relative Deprivation

  • Economic and Educational Disparities
    • Unequal access to resources fosters communal resentment.
    • Example: Sachar Committee Report (2006) – Found Muslims lagging behind in education, jobs, and wealth, fueling feelings of deprivation.
  • Competition for Jobs and Resources
    • Reservation policies and affirmative action create inter-group tensions.
    • Example: Mandal Commission (1990s) backlash, leading to communal consolidation among upper castes.
  • Perceived Discrimination by the State
    • Perceived neglect of one community fosters communal polarization.
    • Example: Kashmir Conflict – Perceived economic and political alienation of Kashmiri Muslims led to extremism.

Conclusion

Communalism in India is not a natural outcome of religious diversity but a consequence of socio-political and economic factors. Both power struggles and relative deprivation contribute to its rise, making inclusive policies, economic upliftment, and political neutrality essential to curb communalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *